Animals: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
([[Medhananda]]:) “Only an old-fashioned mechanistic conception of the universe looks at [[life]] as merely the sum of living beings. Like all fields in this universe, the field of life is not a mechanical aggregate of parts. Life is a whole, a system, a totality of lines of forces: of the bliss of life.<br> | ([[Medhananda]]:) “Only an old-fashioned mechanistic conception of the universe looks at [[life]] as merely the sum of living beings. Like all fields in this universe, the field of life is not a mechanical aggregate of parts. Life is a whole, a system, a totality of lines of forces: of the bliss of life.<br> | ||
In such a field an animal is the area in which the strength of the field assumes a summit value, an intense concentration of force, of bliss. And this bliss is a continuum of flowing changes which become visible to our eyes as flowers and trees, as insects, birds and animals.”<ref>''[[=1 Animal (Issue 1966-3)]]</ref> | In such a field an animal is the area in which the strength of the field assumes a summit value, an intense concentration of force, of bliss. And this bliss is a continuum of flowing changes which become visible to our eyes as flowers and trees, as insects, birds and animals.”<ref>''[[=1 "Animal" (Issue 1966-3)]]</ref> | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 26 September 2019
“The animal has its consciousness held and imprisoned by the vital; and when it is ready the consciousness changes to the mental and the animal reincarnates as the human being. Some of our cats are ready for the human birth. In man that transition has taken place, he has crossed the border.”[1]
“The subconscient of plants or animals, for example, isn’t individualized; what we call an animal’s behavior doesn’t arise from individualization but from the genius of the species.”[2]
- “Mother,
About the vital world described in “Love and Death” you said that “those who live exclusively in the physical and the vital go there after death”. Does it follow that even animals and plants have to go there? How do they manage to come out from there?
Except for very rare cases, the animals are not individualised and when they die they return to the spirit of the species.”[3]
(Medhananda:) “Only an old-fashioned mechanistic conception of the universe looks at life as merely the sum of living beings. Like all fields in this universe, the field of life is not a mechanical aggregate of parts. Life is a whole, a system, a totality of lines of forces: of the bliss of life.
In such a field an animal is the area in which the strength of the field assumes a summit value, an intense concentration of force, of bliss. And this bliss is a continuum of flowing changes which become visible to our eyes as flowers and trees, as insects, birds and animals.”[4]
“You have no idea of the almost magical effect of staring fearlessly into the eyes of a vital being. Even on earth, if you deal in this way with all those incarnations of the vital powers which we ordinarily call animals, you are assured of easy mastery. A physical tiger will also flee from you, if without the least tremor you look him straight in the eyes. A snake will never be able to bite you if you manage to rivet its gaze to yours without feeling the slightest dread. Merely staring at it with shaking knees will not help. There must be no disturbance in you: you must be calm and collected when you catch its gaze as it keeps swaying its head in order to fascinate you into abject fear. Animals are aware of a light in the human eyes which they are unable to bear if it is properly directed towards them. Man’s look carries a power which nullifies them, provided it is steady and unafraid.”[5]
- ↑ Evening Talks with Sri Aurobindo, p.457, “On the Gods and Asuras”, 1 June 1926
- ↑ Mother's Agenda 1961, 2 August 1961
- ↑ More Answers from the Mother, p.286
- ↑ =1 "Animal" (Issue 1966-3)
- ↑ Questions and Answers 1929-1931, p.166
See also